Star Trek Transporter pt 3, Mary the Super-scientist

 

Meet Mary the Super-scientist. She is the world’s foremost authority on human vision, according to a famous thought experiment by Frank Jackson. We’ll deal with that in due course. For present purposes, she is also the leading expert on transporter technology and the designer of the transporter aboard the Enterprise.

Now, imagine that you are James T. Kirk, Captain of the Starship Enterprise. You have an important mission requiring you to transport down to the surface of the planet the Enterprise is orbiting. Of course, you’ve been transported many times. It’s routine and entirely safe. What goes on down on the planet will be perilous, but not stepping into the transporter. You think it will be you yourself—token identity—who comes out on the other side, down on the planet. 

Today, Mary is aboard ship, studying the transporter mechanism. You strike up a conversation about the technology. She has something surprising to say:

Actually Captain, the body that comes out the other end and arrives on the planet is only type identical to you, not token identical. You—the guy standing right here—are destroyed by the process. But don’t worry. The copy of you will be just like you. He will be your functional equivalent. The crew will notice no difference at all. Of course, when the copy of you beams back up to the Enterprise, that copy will be destroyed. What appears back on the Enterprise will be a copy of a copy, ready to assume command and fully capable. That second copy will think he is the Kirk that has been around all along. The very first Kirk—the one whose childhood you remember— was destroyed a long time ago, the first time he stepped into the transporter. You— the guy I’m talking to right now— is a 133rd copy of the original, who is long gone. 

Now, Captain, if you’ll just step into the transporter, we can get on with the mission. Oh, and… well… good-bye.

Are you stepping into the transporter? Surely you are going to hesitate, at least. You’ve got a job to do. Your mission requires you to step into the transporter. But if Mary is right— and she knows more about the transporter than anyone—your existence will end in a few seconds. This is the most important decision of your life and possibly your last.    

A few thoughts flash through your mind. “I’m a copy of a copy, of a copy, etc. Does that matter? Right now, I am a fully functioning biological entity with my own thoughts and feelings. I am not an android or a fake. I have human rights. My ongoing existence matters to me just as much as if I’d never been in a transporter. I am Captain Kirk. There is no other. There’s something it’s like to be me. Will that something end in a few seconds?”

And you wonder how Mary can know that her transporter spits out only type identity, not token identity. The Kirk who comes out looks just like the one who went in, acts just like him, has exactly the same ability to command the Enterprise.   Other than location, the new Kirk is indistinguishable from the old; that’s what makes him type identical. He will claim to be the old. 

What is the test— scientific or otherwise— that determines whether he is the same token or not? For the Enterprise crew, what difference does it make whether the Kirk’s identity is token or only type? They can’t tell the difference. For anyone other than Kirk, there is no difference. Put a book through the transporter. Out comes a type identical book. Same token? Who cares? It makes no difference. Maybe it’s a meaningless question. There is no “what it’s like to be” a book from the inside. 

This, then, is the paradox. For Kirk’s crew, it makes no difference whether the transporter spits out the token identical guy, or merely someone type identical. But for Kirk, it means everything. From the outside, who cares. From the inside, it’s the only thing that matters. 

 

mary thelawsofgodsandmen6-600x337.jpg

 

Update: see my comments on  Am I a Type or a Token, guest post by Henry Shevlin 8/24/17 at Eric Schwitzgebel’s blog The Splintered Mind   http://schwitzsplinters.blogspot.com/2017/08/am-i-type-or-token-guest-post-by-henry.html

 

2 Comments

  1. How does one’s personal experiences make sense of this copy? Would the copy react in the same way that the original did? Do experiences matter in a different way than just a combination of atoms would? Would experiences not be something to help understand if the copy or the original came out? This reminds me of the consciousness of humans vs their robot counterparts. How do we determine who is real?

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Good questions! Not easy to come up with answers. What comes out of the transporters reacts to everything just like what went in. If we are saying that that the transporter makes merely a copy, it’s a perfect one. The new Kirk will seem to be the old one to the crew and everyone else. The new Kirk will think he is the old one–not just a copy. The question is whether the Kirk who went into the transporter is the Kirk who comes out. Will the experiences of the new Kirk be a continuation of the experiences of the old Kirk, the way your experiences today are a continuation of your experiences yesterday? Or will the old Kirk end completely? There does not seem to be any way to decide.

    As for whether robots have consciousness, how should we decide? Is there something it is like to be a robot? Consider the self-driving car. It can do everything the human driver can do, maybe better. But there is nothing it is like to be the car.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s